<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I Love the SarcMark  :-&#124;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cosmicsitcom.com/2010/01/the-sarcmark-is-the-esperanto-of-punctuation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cosmicsitcom.com/2010/01/the-sarcmark-is-the-esperanto-of-punctuation/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=the-sarcmark-is-the-esperanto-of-punctuation</link>
	<description>Travels, rants and raves by Carlos Pedraza</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 02:06:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Carlos Pedraza</title>
		<link>http://cosmicsitcom.com/2010/01/the-sarcmark-is-the-esperanto-of-punctuation/comment-page-1/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos Pedraza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cosmicsitcom.com/?p=1337#comment-83</guid>
		<description>Good point, Solak.

I&#039;ll concede the last SarcMark® in the commercial was actually sarcastic. Ironically, because it was making fun of itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point, Solak.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll concede the last SarcMark® in the commercial was actually sarcastic. Ironically, because it was making fun of itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: solak</title>
		<link>http://cosmicsitcom.com/2010/01/the-sarcmark-is-the-esperanto-of-punctuation/comment-page-1/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>solak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 21:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cosmicsitcom.com/?p=1337#comment-81</guid>
		<description>Oh, and I suppose the last sarcmark in the commercial is close to being sarcasm.

Nice commercial. :-/

Or as I might reword it:

Nice commercial. … NOT!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and I suppose the last sarcmark in the commercial is close to being sarcasm.</p>
<p>Nice commercial. :-/</p>
<p>Or as I might reword it:</p>
<p>Nice commercial. … NOT!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: solak</title>
		<link>http://cosmicsitcom.com/2010/01/the-sarcmark-is-the-esperanto-of-punctuation/comment-page-1/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>solak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 21:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cosmicsitcom.com/?p=1337#comment-80</guid>
		<description>Hence my tweet reply to ChrisPirillo

@ChrisPirillo Sure, I&#039;d love to spend two bucks to express myself with a graphic that no one else can see unless they also pony up $2. :-/

I agree with your additional points as well. I predict that the sarcmark will gather a small population who think it&#039;s great, and they&#039;ll probably be militant about evangelizing the rest of us so they can justify their expenditure of two dollars for the ugly thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hence my tweet reply to ChrisPirillo</p>
<p>@ChrisPirillo Sure, I&#8217;d love to spend two bucks to express myself with a graphic that no one else can see unless they also pony up $2. :-/</p>
<p>I agree with your additional points as well. I predict that the sarcmark will gather a small population who think it&#8217;s great, and they&#8217;ll probably be militant about evangelizing the rest of us so they can justify their expenditure of two dollars for the ugly thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
